so....wait... now there's crap out there talking about
:
(there's other links within the article.)
Haven't been able to find that quote .. but it's like.. they're trying to make it sound worse.. and faster? There's another link in there that actually shows that for the majority, green-house gas emissions have actually gone down
significantly (except in "developing countries"):
Quote:
Thirty-eight of the 41 Parties included in Annex I to the Convention (Annex I Parties) submitted
their national greenhouse gas (GHG) inventories in 2007; 18 of them submitted by the deadline of
15 April. Thirty-six Annex I Parties provided a national inventory report.
For all Annex I Parties taken together, total aggregate GHG emissions excluding
emissions/removals from land use, land-use change and forestry (LULUCF) decreased by 2.8
per cent between 1990 and 2005 (by 4.6 per cent for GHG emissions including LULUCF). For
Annex I Parties with economies in transition (Annex I EIT Parties) GHG emissions excluding
LULUCF decreased by 35.2 per cent; GHG emissions including LULUCF decreased by 36.2 per
cent. For the Annex I non-EIT Parties, GHG emissions excluding LULUCF increased by 11.0 per
cent and GHG emissions including LULUCF increased by 10.0 per cent.
|
Soooo.. I guess.... it's not enough to stop this roaring train of global destruction. The fact that we're at levels lower than 1990...doesn't mean anything to them? hello? anybody else see this? lol